Совершенствование современной правоприменительной практики в документах о предоставление туристических услуг в контексте европейского опыта

Marina Semenova, PhD in Law, research officer

National Academy of Legal Sciences

Executive Partner of Private Enterprise

“Legal Company “Semenova and Partners”

Ukraine

 

Marina Gunare, Dr.sc.pol., assoc.prof

Baltic International Аcademy

Latvia

 

Improvements to contemporary law enforcement practice in the documents on the provision of tourism services within the context of European experience

 

Abstract. The article dwells upon issues arising in the scope of activities of tour operators and travel agents related to the incompleteness and contradictory nature of the legal rules governing the contractual relationship between the person providing tourism services and the consumer of such serser­vices. Special attention is paid to the concept of “Set of Tourism Services” and “Contract on the Provi­sion of a Complex of Tourism Services”.

Key words: tourism, package tour, contract on the provision of a complex of tourism services, consumer, tourism service.

 

Марина Семенова, канд. юрид. наук, научный сотрудник

НГИ правового обеспечения инновационного развития

Национальная академия правовых наук Украины

управляющий партнер ЧП «Юридическая фирма «Семенова и Партнеры», г. Харьков, Украина

Украина

 

Марина Гунаре, Dr.sc.pol., ассоц.проф.

Балтийская Международная Академия

Латвия

 

Совершенствование современной правоприменительной практики в документах о предоставление туристических услуг в контексте европейского опыта

 

Аннотация: Статья посвящена исследованию вопросов, возникающих в сфере деятельности туроператоров и турагентов, связанных с неполнотой и противоречивостью правовых норм, регулирующих договорные отношения между лицом, предоставляющим туристическую услугу и потребителем такой услуги. Особое внимание уделено понятию «комплекс туристических услуг» и «договор о предоставлении комплекса туристических услуг».

Ключевые слова: туризм, турпакет, договор о предоставлении комплекса туристических услуг, потребитель, туристическая услуга.

 

Problem statement

Nowadays, tourism is one of the sectors of the global economy and the economy of Ukraine, which develops intensively and causes both the development of individual industries and the so­cio-economic development of entire countries. It allows small and medium-sized businesses devel­opment without significant state expenses, as well as providing employment, attracting funds and in­vestments and infrastructure development. In gen­eral, tourism occupies the first place in the world in terms of job creation. The global field of tourism services itself involves more than 260 million peo­ple, which are 10% of all employees [1, p. 19].

Ukraine has significant objective precon­ditions to become one of the most developed countries in the tourism sector. The development of tourism activity is greatly facilitated by the geographical location of Ukraine, which is locat­ed in the center of the Eurasian continent, has a favorable climate and unique historical and nat­ural landscapes. However, the current Law “On Tourism” is declarative for today in relation to the practice of tourism activity, international legisla­tion and Ukraine’s participation in international organizations. Moreover, the tourism legislation is so imperfect that it is not taken seriously enough by the international community [2]. Ratification of the Association Contract between Ukraine and the EU [3] along with visa-free regime was the first step towards to irreversible process of Ukraine’s existence in the EU economic and legal environ­ment, as envisaged in the Association Contract, which leaves open the future development of the relations between Ukraine and the EU. Implemen­tation of the provisions of Chapter 16, “Tourism”, section V “Economic and Sectoral Cooperation” of the Contract will lead to increased competi­tiveness of the tourism industry as a generator of economic growth and will stimulate the economy, employment, and improve the investment climate and promote infrastructure development.

Under such conditions, development of tourism industry in Ukraine is one of the priori­ties of the state. However, Ukraine can become more attractive for tourists all over the world only against clear organization of tourism activities and balanced legal regulation, improvement of mecha­nisms of state regulation of tourism activities, also through modern international, primarily European, experience.

Rationale. Significant contribution to the development of the issues of legal regulation of contractual relations for the provision of services was made by O. V. Dzera, O. P. Durovich, O. A. Be­lyanevych, O. M. Vinnik, N. I. Braginsky, V. V. Vitry­ansky, V. S. Milash, V. S. Scherbina, etc. But there are virtually no monographs in the scientific legal literature on the complex research of the legal na­ture of contractual relations arising in a field of rendering of tourism and accompanying services based on new national legislation and the EU leg­islation that regulates the specificity of tourist ac­tivity. This necessitates a more detailed study of such relations for further use in the development of recommendations for improving the legislation and practice of its application in the field of regula­tion of relations on rendering of tourism services.

The goal of the article is to study the EU law and the definition of the complex of tourism services (package tour), the content, and the sub­ject matter of the contract on provision of tourism services and the doctrinal concepts to such con­tracts.

The main study base: Economic and legal regulations of the contracts in the field of tourism appear in conclusion of contract and execution of the contract by the parties who undertake the obligations as well as liability for non-performance or improper performance of such obligations [4 p. 25]. Analysis of contractual and legal relations in the field of tourism proves that such relationships are characterized by a equivocation. The contract, which is one of the most characteristic tourism activities — the contract for travel services, will be considered below.

The Contract for travel services has no sin­gle generally accepted name in international prac­tice. For example, in the EU Council Directive of 13 June 1990 On Integrated Tourism, Leisure and Package Tours 90/314/EEC (hereinafter – Council Directive 90/314/EEC) [5], which was valid until 1 July 2018, a contract is an arrangement, which binds the consumer and the provider and/or dis­tributor.

The Directive (EU) 2015/2302 of the Eu­ropean Parliament and EU Council from Novem­ber 25, 2015 On the Package Tours and Related Travel Services and amending Regulation (EC) No. 2006/2004 and Directive 2011/83/EU of the Eu­ropean Parliament and of the Council and repealing Council Directive 90/314/EEC (hereinafter — Direc­tive 2015/2302/EC)[6], which has the immediate objective of proper functioning of the internal market and achievement of a high level of consumer protection by approximating certain aspects of the laws, regulations and administrative procedures of the participating countries, related to contracts on package travel and organized tourism services, which are concluded between tourists and sellers, use of the term “Package travel contract.” The Package travel contract means the agreement on the package in a whole or, if the package is pro­vided under different contracts, all contracts for the provision of services included in the package. Thus, the term “package” means a combination of at least two different types of tourism services for the trip or holiday, if: 1) such services are con­nected by one seller, including at the request or according to the choice of the tourist, before the conclusion of the contract on the provision of the entire complex of services; or 2) regardless of the conclusion of separate contracts with individual providers of tourism services, the following ser­vices: a) purchased in a single point of sale within the same booking; b) it was proposed or paid for the all-inclusive price or total price;) when advertis­ing and selling the term “package” or similar term was used; d) were combined after the conclusion of the contract that the seller allows the tourist to choose from a set of different types of tourism ser­vices; or d) were purchased from individual sellers via a coherent online booking when making the reservation, the name of the tourist and its details are transferred from the seller to the seller at the latest after confirmation of the booking of the first service. This Directive does not apply to packages and organized tourism services if the duration of the trip is less than 24 hours unless overnight ac­commodation is not included.

The Law of the Republic of Latvia «Tourism Law»” [7] uses the concept «package tourism ser­vice» – a combination of at least two different tour­ism services per one journey that meets one of the following requirements:

(a) it is aggregated by one service provider, including the request of the traveler or according to the traveler’s choice, before concluding a single contract for all services;

(b) regardless of whether separate con­tracts are signed with the service providers, tour­ism services are: purchased at the same point at a tourism service point, and the traveler has cho­sen these services before agreeing to pay; offered, sold or claimed for one inclusive or common price; advertised or sold using the words “package tour­ism service” or other similar terms; merged after the conclusion of a contract by which the provider gives the traveler the right to choose from the offer of different types of tourism services; purchased from individual service providers through linked online booking processes if the service provider with the first contract transmits information about the traveler’s name, payment details and e-mail address to one or more service providers and an agreement with the last service provider or ser­vice provider is concluded not later than within 24 hours after the confirmation of the first tourist ser­vice booking.

Taking into account the Law of the Repub­lic of Latvia «Tourism Law» [7] «package tourism service agreement» – an agreement on a package of tourism services in general or, if the package tourism service is offered in accordance with sep­arate agreements, all contracts relating to tourist services included in the package tourism service.

The law of the Republic of Poland “On tour­ism services” from 29.08.1997 [8] regulates the requirements to the contract on granting of tour­ism services in Chapter 3, which describes the protection of the rights of consumers and defines it as a contract between the tour operator or trav­el agent, on the one hand, and consumers on the other hand. The law of the Republic of Poland “On tourism services” defines the consumer according to Directive 90/314/EEC, according to which a consumer is a person who intends to conclude or has concluded a contract for the provision of tour­ism services on its own behalf or on behalf of an­other person, and this transaction is not the sub­ject of its business activities, as well as the person on whose behalf the contract was made and the person to whom the right to use specified in the contract of tourism services has been delegated [9].

In the Law of the Republic of Latvia «Tourism Law» [7], a natural or legal person who wishes to conclude a contract for the provision of integrated tourist services or related tourist services or has the right to travel on the basis of an agreement on the provision of integrated tourist services or ap­propriate tourist services is referred to as “wander­er”. Under the consumer, the Law of the Republic of Latvia “Consumer Rights Protection Law» [10] implies a natural person who expresses a wish to purchase, purchases or might purchase, or use goods or a service for a purpose, which is not relat­ed to his or her economic or professional activity.

From the point of view of EU law, the con­cept of “consumer” for tourists is defined in such legal acts: the Directive No. 2005/29/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of the EU concerning unfair business-to-consumer commer­cial practices in the internal market (Directive on unfair commercial practices) [11], Directive 97/7/ EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 20 May 1997 on the protection of consumers in respect of distance contracts” [12], Directive No. 2002/65/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of the EU concerning distance market­ing of consumer financial services and amending Council Directive No. 90/619/EC and Directives No. 97/7/EC and 98/27/EC [13], Council Direc­tive 93/13/EC of 5 April 1993 on unfair terms in consumer contracts [14].

A systematic analysis of the named regulato­ry legal acts of the EU enables us to formulate the following General characteristics of the consumer in EU law: 1) a consumer shall be only a physical person; 2) consumer buys goods or services on the basis of the contract with the entrepreneur; 3) consumer buys goods or services without the implementation of entrepreneurial or professional activity.

The incompleteness and inconsistency of legal rules governing the contractual relationship between the provider of the tourism service and the consumer lead to the violation of consumer’s rights as the weaker party to the contract.

According to the article 20 of the law of Ukraine “Concerning tourism” from September, 15th, 1995 No. 324/95-BP (hereinafter – law of Ukraine “Concerning tourism”) [15] under the con­tract on tourist service is providing for the payment by one party – the tour operator directly or through a travel agent – package tour by the order of the other party (the tourist). General provisions of the contract on the provision of services are applied to the contract for travel services, unless otherwise provided by law.

Due to the uncertainty of the content of the contract on the provision of tourism and relat­ed services the rights of tourists are violated. By the decision of the Supreme Economic Court of Ukraine of May 31, 2011, case No. 5002-9/4721- 2010 [16], it was established that under a contract for the sale of hotel vouchers and services for va­cationers, the Seller (health and wellness institu­tion) has sold to a tour operator (the Buyer) hotel vouchers to a clinical sanatorium. However, the hotel voucher is defined as the document neither by the Central Committee of Ukraine nor by the law of Ukraine “Concerning tourism”. The concept of “hotel voucher” in the statutory acts connected with provision of tourism services, is found only in the Law of Ukraine “About improvement and rest of children” and is defined as the document that certifies the right of the child to receive services for rehabilitation and recreation, the conditions of stay in the institution and establishes the cost and range of recreation services and recreation for one child in a particular institution. The term “hotel voucher” is also mentioned in the Regula­tion on the travel voucher (Appendix No. 1 to the resolution of the Collegium of the state Commit­tee of Ukraine of 23 February 1994, No. 7) [17], in which the hotel voucher is equivalent to a travel voucher, which is contrary to the provisions of the law of Ukraine “Concerning tourism”, because the voucher is a contract for tourism services, and its execution and compliance with the agreement is stipulated by the order of the State tourism admin­istration of Ukraine of 06.06.2005 No. 50 [18], which approves the description of the voucher form and the Instruction on the procedure for making a voucher for the provision of tourist services and its use. This perception of “the hotel voucher” led to the fact that the court acknowledged the contract called mixed according to part 2 of article 628 of the Civil Code of Ukraine [19], which contains el­ements of both contract of sale and contract for the provision of services. The concept of “contract of purchasing hotel vouchers for the provision of services of sanatorium-resort treatment” is also found in the Decision of the Kyiv Economic Court of Appeal of February 29, 2012 case No. 18/272 [20]. But we believe that such mixtion (provision of services for sale and purchase – hotel vouch­er) leads to content disturbance of the contract on the provision of services primarily in the fact that the document – hotel voucher itself – has no val­ue and also just confirms the provision of the ser­vices. Furthermore, providing services allows for clear defining of the object of a service contract – accommodation in a room for the sanatorium treatment.

In case No. 2-29/1055-2010, according to the resolution of the Sevastopol Economic Court of Appeal of 04 August 2010 [21], the courts of two instances have confirmed the elements of the legal relations according to the Law “Concerning tourism”. The contract, which was concluded between the tour operator and boarding house, con­tained a commitment to implement the package of travel services through cyclical visits or one-time applications. The scope and content of tourism ser­vices under the contract determined by the parties according to the applications or allocated places quota. Specific conditions for travel services have been agreed by the annexes to the agreement, which stated the cost of tourism services and the list of additional services. The courts confirmed the nature of the services that were provided by the tour operator to tourists and confirmed by the provision of a voucher to tourists. In contrast to the above decision of the Supreme Economic Court of Ukraine on 8 November 2011 in case No. 25/123 services were not considered as sale / purchase of the voucher. On the contrary, the voucher, the necessity of which was considered in the case, is correctly recognized by the court as a document confirming the existence of relations between the tourist and the subject of tourism activity, which provides tourism services, and therefore the voucher can not be the evidence proving that the plaintiff executed its obligations to the defendant. In addition, the court recognized the voucher issue as a form of contract between the tourist and the subject of tourism activity and can not be the sub­ject of sale in the relationship of the tour operator both with a tourist and boarding house, because such contracts are services. It can serve as a con­firmation of the falsity of recognition vouchers as the subject of sales contract in case No. 25/123, because the purpose and making of the voucher are similar to voucher issuance. These findings are also confirmed by the Letter of the Supreme Court of Ukraine dated 01.02.2014. “The findings of the Supreme Court of Ukraine set out in the ordinanc­es on the results of consideration of applications for judicial review of the decision with grounds set in paragraph 1 of part 1 of article 355 of the Civil procedural code of Ukraine, for the second half of 2013.” [22].

From these court judgments it can be con­cluded that lack of standard conditions of con­tracts associated with the provision of services on temporary accommodation and related services concerned with the resort services leads to the ab­sence of a clear definition of the rights and obliga­tions of the parties.

and a description of the scope of contract. In this case, at accommodation in medical insti­tutions, providing additional services in these in­stitutions will result in the emergence of a mixed contract, as the seller of vouchers must be oblig­atory considered by a tour operator, or should not provide any services at all and perform sales only as a person acting under a power of attorney, and therefore may receive funds only from the operator of the “Grantor” – in our case − medical institu­tions.

It is worth noting that scientists have differ­ent approaches to the concept of a contract for tourism services and the determination of its spe­cies.

Well, V. I. Depending on the participants concluding the contract, Gostiuk divides the con­tracts for tourism services into three groups: 1) contracts between the tour operator (travel agent) and the tourist; 2) contracts concluded between the tour operator and its partners − direct execu­tors of separate services; 3) contracts concluded between the tour operator and travel agent [23, p. 165]. We do not support this position because the contract for tourism services is just a contract between the tour operator/travel agent and the customer, which is the consumer of travel services or a third party serving in the interests of the con­sumer.

  1. F. Kyfiak says that contracts for the provi­sion of tourism services are contracts concluded between the subjects of tourism activity and con­sumers of the tourist product [24, p. 68]. In our opinion, such a definition does not give clear un­derstanding about the subjects of such contracts, because, firstly, according to article 5 of the law of Ukraine “Concerning tourism”, the subjects of tourism activities are: tour operators, travel agents; interpreters, tour guides, sports instructors, con­ductors and other specialists of tourist support; in­dividuals who are not subjects of entrepreneurial activities providing services of temporary accom­modation (residence), catering, etc. And secondly, the other party to the contract may be not only a consumer, but a person who is not a direct con­sumer of services.

Yu. Korostashivets believes that, in accor­dance with article 5 of the law of Ukraine “Con­cerning tourism”, the parties to the contract for tourism services are “legal and physical persons who create the tourist product, tourism services or provide mediation services for the provision of typical and related services, as well as citizens of Ukraine, foreign citizens and stateless persons in whose interests tourist activity is implemented” [25, p. 97]. But this implies that the contractor under the contract may be any subject of tourism activity, and the customer can be any person who consumes any service in the field of tourism.

Some scientists define the subject of regu­lation of the contract for tourism services as the travel services and the process of their delivery [26, p. 120]. In our view, this conclusion is too gen­eral and does not allow for separating the subject of the regulation of the contract for tourism ser­vices from the subject matter of other contracts existing in the field of tourism. For example, M. M. Gudyma separates the contract on providing the tourism services and contracts entered into by the operator with direct executors of separate tourist services on criteria such as the subject and parties to the contracts, emphasizing that the subject of the contract on the provision of tourism services is complex, and therefore it is wider than the subject of those contracts, which are concluded by the tour operator with the executors of tourism services. Concerning the parties to the said contracts, it is noted that the contractors of tour operators under the contracts on the provision of tourism services is a customer of travel services that they receive for personal needs or order in favor of other indi­viduals − professionals in providing relevant ser­vices to tourists (hotels , carriers, etc.) [27, p. 15].

In formulating the definition of the subject of the contract on providing the tourism services, M. M. Gudyma determines the statutory term for tourism services provision (more than 24 hours to one year) as one of the characteristic features of the contract [27, p. 7, 18].

We are convinced that the travel period alone is not the defining characteristic of the con­tract for tourism services because the cumulative characteristic features of this contract that sepa­rates it from other contracts are:

1) combination of two or more services. At this, according to the court’s case law of the Euro­pean Union, it makes no difference when services were combined, before signing the contract with the tourist or with the request, in accordance with the tourist’s selection. The same principles apply regardless of the booking – by agent or online [28];

2) special subject composition: executor is the travel agent or tour operator, the customer is the service consumer – tourist or excursionist who stays overnight in the place visited;

3) the conditions of stay in the place visited – at least one night’s stay.

It should be noted that, on behalf of the con­sumer, the contract can be signed by third parties also, but a direct consumer is a tourist, according­ly, the contract will be a contract for travel services and have the same essential conditions.

On the basis of a system analysis of the con­tractual relations arising in the field of tourism ser­vices, contracts for travel services can be divided into two groups depending on the subject compo­sition:

1) contracts concluded directly with the con­sumer. The executor in such contracts is the sub­ject of economic activities, the customer — a natu­ral person. Relations in such contracts are regulat­ed by the General norms of the Central Committee of Ukraine, laws of Ukraine “Concerning tourism” and the law of Ukraine “On protection of consumer rights” from 12.05.1991 No. 1023-XII (hereinafter – the Law No. 1023-XII) [29]. 2) Contracts in favor of third parties are negotiated by subjects with a person who is not a direct consumer of service. The executor in such contracts is the subject of economic activities, the customer − a business entity that concludes a contract in the interests of direct consumer of service who is a natural per­son. Relations in such contracts are regulated by the General norms of the Central Committee of Ukraine and the Civil Code of Ukraine, laws of Ukraine “Concerning tourism” and the Law No. 1023-XII.

The subject of regulation of the contract for tourism services is a range of travel services and the process of their provision.

Conclusions. In conclusion, it should be noted that to cover the concept of a contract for tourism services, which is used by the current law of Ukraine “Concerning tourism”, for all partici­pants who can be parties to the contract, the sub­jects of such agreements should comprise not only tour operators, travel agents and tourists, but also excursionist, who stays overnight in the place vis­ited, and a third person that acts on their behalf, which, though not a direct consumer of services, but makes payment under the contract.

The definition of “contract for tourism ser­vices” provided in article 36 of the draft law No. 4224 [30] does not disclose the essence of this contract. In addition, the executor means only tour operator, and the scope of the contract means pre-arranged integrated or individual tourist ser­vice.

In our opinion, while it does not represent to full the extent of the relations arising out from this definition, the most comprehensive one is giv­en by M. M. Gudyma: under the contract on pro­viding tourism services, one party (the tour opera­tor, directly or through an agent) shall provide the other party (tourist) the tourism service of complex nature by providing the specific services included in its composition, independently and (or) with the involvement of third parties, and the other party (tourist) is obliged to pay for it a specified amount of money [27, p.18].

Therefore, for the final determination of the content and the formulation the doctrinal concept of a contract for tourist services, we should consid­er the following elements:

1) travel service – any special service direct­ed to the satisfaction of requirements of visitors;

2) several travel services connected by op­erator is a complex of tourism services, which are defined as a package tour with the purpose of reg­ulation;

3) range of travel services (package tour) can contain all the types of services provided in the implementation of tourism activities.

The above gives the reason to propose the following definition: a complex of tourism services (package tour) is a service organization of the trav­el, which contents consist of binding together sep­arate services for transportation and accommoda­tion, together with other additional services.

The issue of the definition of essential condi­tions of such contract and its title in the legislation should be viewed through the prism of contract for the provision of services and, therefore, this con­tract will correspond to the title “the contract on provision of tourism services”. This title more accu­rately reflects the essence of relations which this contract should regulate.

 

References

 

  1. Diadechko L. P. The economy of the travel business. Textbook / L. P. Diadechko. – K.: Center of educational literature, 2007. – 224 p.
  2. Bazhal I. Tourism in the law / Irina Bazhal // Mirror of the week. – December 20, 2002 — No. 49 (424) [Electronic resource]. – URL: https://dt.ua/SOCIETY/turizm_u_zakoni.html
  3. The Agreement Association between Ukraine, on the one hand, and the European Union, the European atomic energy community and their member States, on the other hand. URL: http://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/ show/984_011
  4. Braginsky M. I. Contract law. Book 1: General provisions / M. I. Braginsky, V. V. Vitryansky. – Moscow: Statut, 1997. – 682 p.
  5. Council Directive 90/314/EEC of 13 June 1990 on integrated tourism, leisure and package tours [Electronic resource]. – URL: http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/ TXT/?uri=CELEX:31990L0314&qid=1458458747141
  6. Directive (EU) 2015/2302 of the European Parliament and EU Council dated November 25, 2015 about package tours and related travel services, and amending Regulation (EC) No. 2006/2004 and Directive 2011/83/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council and repealing Council Directive 90/314/EEC [Electronic resource]. – Mode of access: http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/ TXT/?qid=1504626811216&uri=CELEX:32015L2302 .
  7. Tūrisma likums. Pieņemts: 17.09.1998.Stājas spēkā: 01.01.1999, Attēlotā redakcija 01.01.2018 [Електронний ресурс]. – URL: https://likumi.lv/ta/id/50026-turisma-likums. Tourism Law. Adopted: 17.09.1998. In effect from: 01.01.1999, as amended of 01.01.2018 [Electronic resource].
  8. Ustawa z dnia 29 sierpnia 1997 r. o usługach turystycznych [Electronic resource]. – URL: http://isap.sejm. gov.pl/DetailsServlet?id=WDU19971330884.
  9. Turystyka a prawo – Aktualne problemy legislacyjne i konstrukcyjne, red. P.Cybula i J.Raciborski, Sucha Beskidzka-Kraków. – 2008. – st. 71-72. [Electronic resource]. – URL: http://wtir.awf.krakow.pl/index.php/ katedra-polityki-turystycznej/zaklad-prawa?id=387
  10. Patērētāju tiesību aizsardzības likums.18. 03. 1999. Stājas spēkā: 15.04.1999 Attēlotā redakcija 01.01.2017 [Електронний ресурс]. – URL: https://likumi.lv/ta/id/23309-pateretaju-tiesibu-aizsardzibas-likums. Consumer rights protection law adopted 18. 03. 1999. In effect from15.04.1999, as amended of 01.01.2017. [Electronic resource].
  11. Directive No. 2005/29/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of the EU on unfair commercial practices towards consumers in the internal market (Directive on unfair commercial practices) [Electronic resource]. – URL: http://zakon4.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/994_b43.
  12. Directive 97/7/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council “On the protection of consumers in distance contracts” dated May 20, 1997 [Electronic resource]. – URL: http://zakon4.rada.gov.ua/laws/ show/994_245.
  13. Directive No. 2002/65/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council on the distance marketing of consumer financial services and amending Council Directive No. 90/619/EEC and Directive 97/7/EC and 98/27/EC [Electronic resource]. – URL: http://zakon4.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/994_b31.
  14. Council Directive 93/13/EEC of 5 April 1993 on unfair terms in consumer contracts [Electronic resource]. – URL: http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=CELEX:31993L0013:en:HTML.
  15. The law of Ukraine “Concerning tourism” of 15.09.1995 No. 324/95-BP URL: http://zakon0.rada.gov.ua/ laws/show/324/95-вр
  16. The resolution of the Supreme economic court of Ukraine of 31.05.2011 [Electronic resource] : the Unified state register of court decisions. – URL: http:// http://reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/16461418
  17. The regulation on the hotel voucher: Appendix No. 1 to the resolution of the Collegium of the state Committee of Ukraine of February 23, 1994 No. 7 [Electronic resource]. – Mode of access: Inform.-leg. system LEAGUE:the LAW.
  18. The order of the State tourism administration of Ukraine dated 06.06.2005 No. 50 [Electronic resource]. – URL: http://zakon5.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/z0765-05
  19. Civil Code of Ukraine of 16.01.2003 No. 435-IV. URL: http://zakon2.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/435-15
  20. The resolution of the Kyiv economic court of appeal dated February 29, 2012 case No. 18/272 [Electronic resource]: the Unified state register of court decisions. – URL: http://reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/21782436
  21. Resolution of Sevastopol economic court of appeal dated 04.08.2010 [Electronic resource] : the Unified state register of court decisions. – Mode of access: http://reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/11938153.
  22. A letter to the Supreme Court of Ukraine of 01.02.2014 “The findings of the Supreme Court of Ukraine set out in the ordinances on the results of consideration of applications for judicial review of the decision with grounds set in paragraph 1 of part 1 of article 355 of the Civil procedural code of Ukraine, for the second half of 2013.” [20]. – Mode of access: Inform.-leg. system LEAGUE:the LAW
  23. Gostiuk V. I. Contractual regulation of relations in the field of rendering of tourism services. I. Gostiuk // Journal of Kyiv University of law. – 2014. – No. 1. – P. 163-168.
  24. Kyfiak V. F. The organization of tourism activities in Ukraine. F. Kyfiak. – Chernivtsi: Books-XXI, 2003. – 300 p.
  25. Korostashivets Yu. Essential conditions of the contract for travel services according to the legislation of Ukraine / Yu. Korostashivets // Entrepreneurship, economy and law. – 2010. – No. 8. – P. 96-99.
  26. Scientific and practical commentary to the Law of Ukraine “On tourism” / A. T. Matvienko, I. V., Priyanchuk, M. A. Lesik, V. V. Andreytsev. – Kyiv, 2006. – 212 p.
  27. Gudyma M. M. The subject of the contract on rendering of tourism services under the laws of Ukraine : autoabstract dis… PhD in Law / M. M. Gudyma. – Kyiv, 2013. – 20 p.
  28. Directive (EU) 2015/2302 of the European Parliament and EU Council from November 25, 2015. about package tours and related travel services, and amending Regulation (EC) No. 2006/2004 and Directive 2011/83/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council and repealing Council Directive 90/314/EEC [Electronic resource]. – Mode of access: http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/ TXT/?qid=1504626811216&uri=CELEX:32015L2302.
  29. The law of Ukraine “On protection of consumer rights” from 12.05.1991 No. 1023-XII. URL: http://zakon2. rada.gov.ua/laws/show/1023-12
  30. About tourism [Electronic resource]: Draft Law of Ukraine dated 24.02.2014, No. 4224. – URL: http:// w1.c1.rada.gov.ua/pls/zweb2/webproc4_1?pf3511=49894

BALTIJAS JURIDISKAIS ŽURNĀLS. — 2018. — № 3(50) — С. 10-18.

 

(адвокат, АБ ЮФ «Семенова и Партнеры», кандидат юридичних наук)
(Балтийская Международная Академия)